These will be written in the Homework section of your notebook, but must be fairly detailed. In other words, no partial sentences. Your score on these will depend on level of analysis.

What, specifically, is Koch’s claim? Based on the way that he begins his essay, what do you think he assumes about his audience’s position on the death penalty? Be specific and give proof to support your answer.
How does Koch use logos and pathos to build his argument? Use examples from the text to support your answer.
Explain how Koch applies ethos in this essay. Be specific.
How effectively do you think that Koch responds to opposing viewpoints? Does he make any assumptions? If so, cite them.
Koch makes use of analogy in his essay. Find an example or two and analyze how effective it or they are.
Koch makes a moral argument for the death penalty throughout the essay, but especially when he responds to point #6. Which principle(s), ethics and/or guidelines does he attempt to apply to his moral reasoning? Is his argument convincing? Why or why not?
Overall, how effective is Koch in supporting his claim? Did you find any logical fallacies? Be specific.
Describe the author’s persona. Would you describe him as a moderate, reasonable narrator, or do you see him as too weak, too aggressive, or too sarcastic? (You can choose to use your own adjective as well.)Use specific words and phrases to support your position.